The application of microwaves in axillary hyperhidrosis: Curative effect observation of a pathological examination over 1 year

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Aug 7. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15909. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Asia, axillary hyperhidrosis is a frequent problem for many people, and the consequent excessive sweating can seriously affect many aspects of daily life and even lead to mental disorders. Microwave therapy is a new, non-invasive treatment method for axillary hyperhidrosis, whose energy and long-term effectiveness still needs to be clinically validated.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, histological changes, and psychological status of microwave devices in the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis.

METHOD: We conducted a prospective self-controlled study in a top-tier Chinese hospital. After a 5/5 energy treatment session, a skin biopsy was taken to observe histological changes both before and after treatment. An iodine starch test was used to determine the sweating range. We evaluated symptoms of improved efficacy using the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) and assessed changes in life status with the DLQI. In the case of concurrent underarm odor, odor-5, VAS, and Young-Jin Park grading were used to assess odor relief. The effect of odor on psychology was assessed by using a psychological status symptom checklist (scl-90). The study period was 1 year.

RESULTS: We observed 20 patients in this study. Of those, 90% met the primary treatment endpoint of a decrease in axillary hyperhidrosis symptomatology to below grade 2 on the HDSS score (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 75% of patients achieved a treatment endpoint of at least 50% reduction in VAS (p < 0.001). 70% of patients achieved a treatment endpoint of at least 50% reduction in odor-5 (p < 0.001). The iodine starch test showed that the region decreased 99% from the baseline to 12 months after follow-up had ended (p < 0.001). Eight patients volunteered to undergo histological examination; their average light density of immunohistochemistry decreased from 1.04 (0.4-2.11) to 0.07 (0.04-0.46; p < 0.05). The immunohistochemical positive number for sweat glands was initially 104 (59.75-132.5) but was 41.5 (29.75-62) after the procedure. None of the patients experienced any serious adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION: The treatment demonstrated high effectiveness, safety, and short-lived adverse reactions.

PMID:37547985 | DOI:10.1111/jocd.15909

PAI1 inhibits the pathogenesis of primary focal hyperhidrosis by targeting CHRNA1

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jul 21;18(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02808-0.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary focal hyperhidrosis (PFH) may be attributed to the up-regulation of the cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 1 subunit (CHRNA1) in eccrine glands. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI1, encoded by SERPINE1) is reported to inhibit the expression of CHRNA1, while the role of PAI1 in hyperhidrosis is unknown.

METHODS: Serpine1 KO mice, Serpine1-Tg mice, and wild type BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally injected with pilocarpine hydrochloride to induce PFH. Cisatracurium (CIS, antagonist of CHRNA1) or PAI-039 (small-molecule inhibitor of PAI1) was pre-administrated before the induction of hyperhidrosis. On the other hand, Chrna1-expressing AAV was constructed and administered to Serpine1-Tg mice with hydrochloride stimulation. Hydrochloride-related biomarkers, such as acetylcholine (ACH) in the serum, calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 C (CACNA1C), and aquaporin 5 (AQP5) in sweat glands of mice were assayed with ELISA, RT-PCR, and Western blot.

RESULTS: The administration of PAI-039 or Pai1 knock-out increased Chrna1 expression, sweat secretion, and hydrochloride-related biomarkers (ACH, CACNA1C, and AQP5) expression. On the other hand, CIS administration diminished the strengthened hyperhidrosis phenotype induced by Pai1 knock-out with decreased sweat gland secretion.

CONCLUSION: PAI1 inhibits CHRNA1-mediated hydrochloride-induced hyperhidrosis, with decreased sweat gland secretion and diminished ACH, AQP5, and CACNA1C expression. These results indicate the potential to utilize PAI1 to alleviate PFH.

PMID:37542348 | DOI:10.1186/s13023-023-02808-0

Therapeutic Effectiveness of Needle Injection Versus Needle-Free Jet Injector System for Botulinum Toxin Type a in Palmar Hyperhidrosis

J Cutan Med Surg. 2023 Aug 3:12034754231191062. doi: 10.1177/12034754231191062. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The most important problem with local injections of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in palmar hyperhidrosis is pain during the injections.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated therapeutic effectiveness and pain of local injections of BTX-A using needle-free direct administration system.

METHODS: We performed BTX-A local injection therapy using a conventional injection needle in the left hand and a needle-free direct administration system in the right hand.

RESULTS: A reduction in the quantity of perspiration was observed 4 weeks after administration of both Needle and Needle-free BTX-A, and reduction was maintained throughout 28 weeks observation period. Both hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale scores and Dermatology Life Quality Index for hands treated with Needle BTX-A and hands treated with Needle-free BTX-A had decreased significantly by 4 weeks after treatment. Pain visual analog scale scores and the degree of pain were significantly lower in hands treated with Needle-free BTX-A than in hands treated with Needle BTX-A.

CONCLUSIONS: When the trigger of the pressurized needle-free injector device is activated, the gas powered driving pressure propels BTX-A through an orifice (0.13 mm) about four times narrower than a 30 G needle at very high speed. As most pain occurs during the needle prick itself, the advantage of a small orifice coupled with high-speed penetration of BTX-A through the pressurized device results in reduced pain during administration. The needle-free direct administration system administers the injectate under the skin without a visible needle.

PMID:37537972 | DOI:10.1177/12034754231191062

Compensatory Hyperhidrosis After Non-Surgical Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis: Two-Year Single-Centered Prospective Study From Jordan

J Cutan Med Surg. 2023 Jul 31:12034754231191488. doi: 10.1177/12034754231191488. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary focal hyperhidrosis (PH) can be managed by a wide range of medical and surgical modalities. Compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) is a well-documented complication of surgical treatment. We aimed to investigate the occurrence of compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) in PH patients after nonsurgical treatment with botulinum toxin A (BTX- A) or iontophoresis.

METHODOLOGY: We carried out a unicentric prospective study on PH patients from King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) in Jordan. PH patients were evaluated after 1-month of nonsurgical treatment. Patients who developed CH were re-assessed after 3-6 months through a telephone-based interview.

RESULTS: A total of 86 patients with PH who underwent nonsurgical treatment with iontophoresis or botulinum toxin were recruited. Twenty-four (27.9%) patients developed subjective CH. It was mild in (75%), moderate in (21%), and severe in (4%) of patients affected, it was self-limiting within a few months in all patients. Patients with CH did not differ significantly in demographic or clinical variables from patients who did not develop CH except at the site of PH (p value = .05).

CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that more than quarter (27.9%) of patients with PH may develop minor compensatory sweating, however this didn’t affect satisfaction with treatment.

PMID:37522712 | DOI:10.1177/12034754231191488

Hyperhidrosis: A targeted literature review of the disease burden

J Dermatol. 2023 Jul 31. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16908. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Hyperhidrosis is a chronic skin condition characterized by excessive sweating. It poses a burden on affected people, reducing their quality of life and productivity. We undertook a targeted literature review (TLR) to gather current evidence on the epidemiology as well as the human and economic burden posed on patients with hyperhidrosis. Searches were performed in Medline database (access via OVID interface) and ICHUSHI database. Articles published between January 2000 and September 2020 that analyzed at least 50 patients were included. Sixty-four publications were identified and 38 publications covering a unique domain were selected to inform this TLR. The incidence of hyperhidrosis ranged from 0.13% in the UK to 0.28% in the USA, with a higher rate in females. The prevalence of hyperhidrosis varied from 2.8%-4.8% in the US general population to 18.40% in Chinese inpatients, while the prevalence of axillary hyperhidrosis varied from 1.4% in the US general population to 5.75% in Japanese employees/students. Due to excessive sweating, hyperhidrosis was reported to be a moderate-to-extreme limitation at work for the US patients, with 33.5% feeling unhappy. Patients’ satisfaction was high post-treatment. Considerable costs were related to the treatment with botulinum toxin and surgery. Hospital stays for surgery lasted from 10 h to 3 days. The percentage of patients who sought a medical consultation varied from 6.3% for Japanese patients with primary focal hyperhidrosis to 51% for the US general population with any type of hyperhidrosis. There is limited evidence of the hyperhidrosis burden, particularly among Japanese patients; however, the burden was high and limited patients’ daily functioning. Future actions should include implementation of educational programs to raise awareness of the condition, conduct of larger studies, and generation of more evidence. Understanding the nature of hyperhidrosis and the burden it poses is of utmost importance.

PMID:37519134 | DOI:10.1111/1346-8138.16908

Quality of life in individuals with primary hyperhidrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clin Auton Res. 2023 Jul 28. doi: 10.1007/s10286-023-00954-w. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Hyperhidrosis can be a debilitating disease that leads to the deterioration of well-being. In this study, the objective was to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in individuals with and without hyperhidrosis by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist were employed. We systematically searched Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed. Two authors independently assessed the literature and extracted the data. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was employed. The heterogeneity was determined using I2.

RESULTS: Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria comprising 4297 and 147,604 participants with and without hyperhidrosis, respectively. The risk of bias ranged from high quality to very high risk of bias. The individuals with hyperhidrosis had a higher Dermatology Life Quality Index (mean difference 8.53; 95% confidence interval 3.47, 13.58; p = 0.0009) and a lower mental component summary of the short form-12 or -36 (mean difference -6.15; 95% confidence interval -9.00, -3.30; p < 0.0001) than the control individuals. No difference was found for the physical component summary score of the short form-12 or -36 (mean difference -0.88; 95% confidence interval -1.88, 0.12; p = 0.085). Studies using patient-reported outcomes, not included in the meta-analysis, showed similar results.

CONCLUSION: Individuals with hyperhidrosis experience a reduced HRQOL that is clinically meaningful and leads to perceivable deteriorations in their well-being. The evidence shows a high degree of heterogeneity, which warrants additional studies.

PMID:37507605 | DOI:10.1007/s10286-023-00954-w

Treatment of hyperhidrosis with Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA): Development, insights, and impact

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 1;102(S1):e32764. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032764.

ABSTRACT

Hyperhidrosis (chronic excessive sweating) may substantially affect an individual’s emotional and social well-being. Therapies available before onabotulinumtoxinA were generally topical, with limited effectiveness, application-site skin reactions, and frequent, time-consuming treatments. Intradermal injection of onabotulinumtoxinA to treat sweat glands arose as a novel therapeutic approach. To develop this treatment, appropriate dosing needed to be established, and training on administration was required. Further, no previous scale existed to measure the effects of hyperhidrosis on patients’ lives, leading Allergan to develop and validate the 4-point Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS), which measures the disease’s impact on daily activities. The onabotulinumtoxinA clinical development program for hyperhidrosis included 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled pivotal trials, immunogenicity studies, long-term studies of safety and efficacy, and quality of life assessments. In Europe and North America, the primary efficacy measures were, respectively, axillary sweat production measured gravimetrically and HDSS improvement. Compared with placebo, onabotulinumtoxinA treatment significantly reduced axillary sweat production and axillary hyperhidrosis severity, as measured by a 2-point or greater reduction on the HDSS. The effects of onabotulinumtoxinA occurred rapidly, within 1 week after injection, and lasted ≥6 months. Treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA was associated with significant quality of life improvements based on Short Form-12 physical and mental component scores. The Hyperhidrosis Impact Questionnaire also indicated greater treatment satisfaction, reduced negative impact on aspects of daily life, and improved emotional well-being with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo. The clinical development program and subsequent clinical experience showed that onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for hyperhidrosis was well tolerated with no new safety signals, and led to greater disease awareness.

PMID:37499084 | DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000032764

Rhomboid intercostal block versus serratus block for postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized controlled trial

BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 19;23(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02203-z.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although thoracoscopic sympathectomy is made via small incisions, it is associated with severe postoperative pain. Both Rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) and serratus anterior plane block (SABP) are recent techniques used for pain control after such procedures. Herein, we compared RIB and SAPB regarding pain control in patients undergoing thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three groups were enrolled in this prospective randomized study (71 patients in each group); Group S received SAPB, Group R received RIB and Group C as controls. The block procedures were performed after general anesthesia and prior to the skin incision.

RESULTS: The three groups showed comparable demographics and operative time (P ˃ 0.05). Pain scores showed a significant decline with the two block procedures compared to controls during the first day following surgery (both P ˂ 0.05), but Group R had better scores compared to Group S. Both block techniques were associated with a significant prolongation of the time to first rescue analgesic and less fentanyl consumption compared to controls (both P ˂ 0.05). However, both parameters were improved with RIB rather than SAPB (both P ˂ 0.05). Both blocks led to a significant improvement in patient satisfaction than in the control group (both P ˂ 0.05), but it was comparable between the two approaches (P ˃ 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Both RIB and SAPB are safe and effective in pain reduction after thoracoscopic sympathectomy procedures in patients with hyperhidrosis. Moreover, RIB is superior to SAPB as it is associated with better analgesic outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Trial Registry PACTR202203766891354. https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/Researcher/TrialRegister.aspx?TrialID=21522.

PMID:37468840 | DOI:10.1186/s12871-023-02203-z

Anatomical proposal of local anesthesia injection for median nerve block in treating hyperhidrosis with botulinum neurotoxin

Surg Radiol Anat. 2023 Jul 20. doi: 10.1007/s00276-023-03199-4. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hyperhidrosis, causing excessive sweat, can be treated with Botulinum neurotoxin injection. Botulinum toxin, an effective and safe treatment for hyperhidrosis, unfortunately involves significant pain due to multiple injections. This study aims to propose a more efficient and less painful approach to nerve blocks for relief, by identifying optimal injection points to block the median nerve, thereby enhancing palmar hyperhidrosis treatment.

METHODS: This study, involving 52 Korean cadaver arms (mean age 73.5 years), measured the location of the median nerve relative to the transverse line at the pisiform level to establish better nerve block injection sites.

RESULTS: In between the extensor carpi radialis and palmaris longus, the median nerve was located at an average distance of 47.39 ± 6.43 mm and 29.39 ± 6.43 mm from the transverse line at the pisiform level.

DISCUSSION: To minimize discomfort preceding the botulinum neurotoxin injection, we recommend the optimal injection site for local anesthesia to be located 4 cm distal to the transverse line of the pisiform, within the tendons of the palmaris longus and flexor carpi radialis muscles.

PMID:37468725 | DOI:10.1007/s00276-023-03199-4

A comparative evaluation of aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel iontophoresis versus tap water iontophoresis in people with primary palmar hyperhidrosis: A randomized clinical trial

Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2023 Jun 30:1-7. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_975_2022. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Background Primary palmar hyperhidrosis causes a lot of problems for patients and negatively affects their quality of life. Currently, iontophoresis with tap water and aluminum chloride hexahydrate is used for primary palmar hyperhidrosis. Yet, little evidence exists about iontophoresis with aluminum chloride hexahydrate in the form of gel. This study investigated the effect of aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel iontophoresis compared to tap water iontophoresis on primary palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods In this randomized controlled trial study, 32 patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis were divided randomly into two groups (n = 16). Participants received 7 sessions of iontophoresis with aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel or tap water every other day on the dominant hand. The sweating rate was measured by gravimetry and iodine-starch tests before and after the last treatment session. Results Following the iontophoresis, the rate of sweating in both hands in the two groups was significantly reduced (P < 0.001). However, the sweating rate in the treated hand and the non-treated hand showed no significant difference. There was no significant difference observed in sweating rate reduction between both groups over time, but the larger effect size values observed in the aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel iontophoresis group may suggest the superiority of this gel over tap water in reducing the rate of sweating. Limitation Further investigations with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the hypothesis regarding the effectiveness of aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel iontophoresis over other types of iontophoresis. In addition, contraindications of iontophoresis such as pregnancy, pacemakers, and epilepsy should be considered. Conclusion The present study provides preliminary evidence suggesting that aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel iontophoresis is an effective alternative treatment to decrease sweating rate in extended areas with fewer side effects in patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis.

PMID:37436009 | DOI:10.25259/IJDVL_975_2022