Compensatory Hyperhidrosis After Non-Surgical Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis: Two-Year Single-Centered Prospective Study From Jordan

J Cutan Med Surg. 2023 Jul 31:12034754231191488. doi: 10.1177/12034754231191488. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary focal hyperhidrosis (PH) can be managed by a wide range of medical and surgical modalities. Compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) is a well-documented complication of surgical treatment. We aimed to investigate the occurrence of compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) in PH patients after nonsurgical treatment with botulinum toxin A (BTX- A) or iontophoresis.

METHODOLOGY: We carried out a unicentric prospective study on PH patients from King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) in Jordan. PH patients were evaluated after 1-month of nonsurgical treatment. Patients who developed CH were re-assessed after 3-6 months through a telephone-based interview.

RESULTS: A total of 86 patients with PH who underwent nonsurgical treatment with iontophoresis or botulinum toxin were recruited. Twenty-four (27.9%) patients developed subjective CH. It was mild in (75%), moderate in (21%), and severe in (4%) of patients affected, it was self-limiting within a few months in all patients. Patients with CH did not differ significantly in demographic or clinical variables from patients who did not develop CH except at the site of PH (p value = .05).

CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that more than quarter (27.9%) of patients with PH may develop minor compensatory sweating, however this didn’t affect satisfaction with treatment.

PMID:37522712 | DOI:10.1177/12034754231191488

A comparative evaluation of aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel iontophoresis versus tap water iontophoresis in people with primary palmar hyperhidrosis: A randomized clinical trial

Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2023 Jun 30:1-7. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_975_2022. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Background Primary palmar hyperhidrosis causes a lot of problems for patients and negatively affects their quality of life. Currently, iontophoresis with tap water and aluminum chloride hexahydrate is used for primary palmar hyperhidrosis. Yet, little evidence exists about iontophoresis with aluminum chloride hexahydrate in the form of gel. This study investigated the effect of aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel iontophoresis compared to tap water iontophoresis on primary palmar hyperhidrosis. Methods In this randomized controlled trial study, 32 patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis were divided randomly into two groups (n = 16). Participants received 7 sessions of iontophoresis with aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel or tap water every other day on the dominant hand. The sweating rate was measured by gravimetry and iodine-starch tests before and after the last treatment session. Results Following the iontophoresis, the rate of sweating in both hands in the two groups was significantly reduced (P < 0.001). However, the sweating rate in the treated hand and the non-treated hand showed no significant difference. There was no significant difference observed in sweating rate reduction between both groups over time, but the larger effect size values observed in the aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel iontophoresis group may suggest the superiority of this gel over tap water in reducing the rate of sweating. Limitation Further investigations with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the hypothesis regarding the effectiveness of aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel iontophoresis over other types of iontophoresis. In addition, contraindications of iontophoresis such as pregnancy, pacemakers, and epilepsy should be considered. Conclusion The present study provides preliminary evidence suggesting that aluminum chloride hexahydrate gel iontophoresis is an effective alternative treatment to decrease sweating rate in extended areas with fewer side effects in patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis.

PMID:37436009 | DOI:10.25259/IJDVL_975_2022

Effectiveness of Iontophoresis in Treating Plantar Hyperhidrosis

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2023 Jan-Feb;113(1):21-003. doi: 10.7547/21-003.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tap water iontophoresis as a treatment for plantar hyperhidrosis.

METHODS: Thirty participants living with idiopathic plantar hyperhidrosis and consented to undergo treatment using iontophoresis were recruited. The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Score was used to evaluate the severity of the condition before and after treatment.

RESULTS: Tap water iontophoresis was found to be effective in the treatment of plantar hyperhidrosis in the study group (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with iontophoresis led to the reduction of disease severity and improvement of quality of life, and it is a safe, easy-to-use method with minimal side effects. This technique should be considered before the use of systemic or aggressive surgical interventions, which could have potentially more severe side effects.

PMID:36905622 | DOI:10.7547/21-003

Comparison of the Efficacy of Tap Water Iontophoresis Versus Aluminum Chloride Hexahydrate in the Treatment of Palmoplantar Hyperhidrosis

Cureus. 2022 Dec 9;14(12):e32367. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32367. eCollection 2022 Dec.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of tap water iontophoresis (TWI) versus aluminum chloride (AC) hexahydrate in the treatment of palmoplantar hyperhidrosis.

METHODS: The study was a randomized control trial performed at the dermatology department of Pakistan Navy Station (PNS) Shifa Hospital, Karachi from March 2022 to September 2022. A total of 70 palmoplantar hyperhidrosis patients were included in the study after getting approval from the ethical committee. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A patients were treated with TWI three times a week for four weeks. Group B patients were treated with a 20% AC topical solution applied at night to the affected areas for four weeks. The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) score for both groups was calculated at baseline, one, two, three, and four weeks. The final response was labeled at four weeks by comparing mean HDSS reduction in both groups. SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for data analysis.

RESULTS: Mean HDSS was compared for both groups at the end of the study, which showed a significant reduction in the mean score from 3.40 ± 0.65 to 1.48 ± 0.78 in group A, as compared to a decline in scores in group B from 3.28 ± 0.67 to 2.14 ± 0.94 (p = 0.002). In group A, zero, one, two, and three points HDSS improvement was 2.9%, 25.7%, 48.6%, and 22.9%, respectively. Whereas in group B, it was 34.3%, 22.9%, 34.3%, and 8.6%, respectively (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION: As compared to AC topical solution, TWI is an effective, safe, and inexpensive management option for palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. It causes more improvement in HDSS scores and has lesser side effects.

PMID:36627989 | PMC:PMC9826940 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.32367

Treatment of Hyperhidrosis: An Update

Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00707-x. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Hyperhidrosis is a dermatosis presenting as pathologically excessive focal or generalized sweating. The stigmatizing nature of hyperhidrosis may cause patients to feel embarrassment and apprehension about their symptoms and experience a significant decrease in well-being. Severe cases of hyperhidrosis can also increase the risk of developing psychiatric and somatic comorbidities. Conventional non-surgical treatments of hyperhidrosis include aluminum salts, iontophoresis, botulinum toxin injections, and oral glycopyrronium. In recent years, new topical anticholinergic medications and devices have emerged that may improve the patients’ symptoms and even prevent the development of comorbidities. The treatment of hyperhidrosis can be a complex matter and may require the combination of several therapies. The purpose of this paper was to firstly review the literature on existing non-surgical treatment options for hyperhidrosis, and secondly provide a stepwise approach to investigating and treating patients with hyperhidrosis.

PMID:35773437 | DOI:10.1007/s40257-022-00707-x

A Practical Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Palmar Hyperhidrosis

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 7;10(3):e4172. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004172. eCollection 2022 Mar.

ABSTRACT

Palmar hyperhidrosis (PH), a condition characterized by excess sweating of the palms, is a common concern that presents to the plastic surgeon, which can have major impacts on patient confidence and quality of life. While several studies summarize treatment options for hyperhidrosis in general, few outline the therapeutic options available specifically for PH.

METHOD: The authors reviewed the current literature specific to the diagnostic workup and treatment of PH.

RESULTS: In this article, we show a practical approach to managing patients presenting with PH, summarize its main nonsurgical and surgical treatment options, provide a suggested treatment ladder, and outline emerging therapeutic approaches. We suggest that, after diagnosing PH and classifying its severity, nonsurgical treatments (ie, topical antiperspirants, iontophoresis, botulinum toxin A injection, and topical/oral anticholinergics) should be utilized in a stepwise manner. In patients with severe palmar hyperhidrosis who do not respond to nonsurgical treatments, surgical intervention may be warranted, generally in the form of sympathetic denervation.

CONCLUSION: This article provides a clear overview of PH treatment options, stepwise guidelines for physicians, and educational video resources demonstrating botulinum toxin A injections with cryotherapy and nerve blocks.

PMID:35265447 | PMC:PMC8901220 | DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000004172

Hyperhidrosis Comorbidities and Treatments: A Register-based Study among 511 Subjects

Acta Derm Venereol. 2022 Jan 28. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v101.1061. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Hyperhidrosis is a dermatological condition that causes psychosocial impairment and has a negative impact on patients’ quality of life. The epidemiology of hyperhidrosis is currently poorly understood. The aim of this study was to analyse comorbidities and treatments in 511 subjects with hyperhidrosis selected from the patient records of Oulu University Hospital. The mean age of patients with local hyperhidrosis was 27.9 years and the majority were female (62.7%). The most common anatomical site of symptoms in the youngest age group was the palms, whereas the axillae were a more common site in advanced age. Depression was a common comorbidity in both local (11.6%) and generalized hyperhidrosis (28.6%). Anxiety affected 12.7% of patients with generalized hyperhidrosis. In 36.8% of the patients with local hyperhidrosis there was a delay in diagnosis of more than 10 years. The most commonly used treatments included topical antiperspirants, iontophoresis and botulin toxin injections.

PMID:35088873 | DOI:10.2340/actadv.v101.1061

Comparison of 10 versus 20 sessions tap water iontophoresis efficacy in the treatment of palmoplantar hyperhidrosis

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jan 4. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14723. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tap water iontophoresis (TWI) is an effective treatment option for palmoplantar hyperhidrosis (HH). However, the optimal number and frequency of TWI sessions to control profuse sweating are unclear.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of 10 and 20 sessions of TWI in patients with palmoplantar HH and determine the adequate number of sessions to achieve a favorable clinical response.

METHODS: Eighty patients treated with TWI for palmoplantar HH were included. The alteration in sweating intensity considering the mean value of gravimetric measurement and mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores after the 10th and 20th session of TWI were calculated. The difference between performing 10 and 20 sessions of TWI in providing improvement of HH was analyzed. We also conducted a telephone-based inquiry to determine the patients’ outcome.

RESULTS: The reduction in sweating intensity was significant both after the 10th (p < 0.001) and 20th (p < 0.001) sessions when compared with the basal level considering gravimetry and VAS. When the mean sweating intensity after the 10th and 20th sessions were compared, no difference was observed gravimetrically (p = 0.03); the difference between the mean score of VAS after the 10th and 20th sessions (p < 0.001) was significant. Eleven and nine patients not considering a maintenance or an alternative treatment had lower and same sweating intensity as compared with the baseline, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Ten TWI sessions within two weeks for managing palmoplantar HH are adequate to achieve a clinical response. However, the patients are more satisfied when they receive 20 sessions instead of 10 sessions of TWI.

PMID:34982502 | DOI:10.1111/jocd.14723

The treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis – a systematic review

Int J Dermatol. 2021 Oct 15. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15937. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PH) can have a significantly negative impact on an individual’s quality of life. Currently, there appears to be no review of the effectiveness of the different interventions for its management.

METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidelines, the Cochrane Database, and MEDLINE (OVID) to identify relevant studies published from 1997 to 2017.

RESULTS: Of the 574 references yielded, six met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for this review. Two studies evaluated the use of oral oxybutynin as an anticholinergic treatment for PH; this demonstrated high efficacy with over 80% of patients reporting symptom improvement; dry mouth was the most common adverse effect reported. One study looking at the use of iontophoresis reported 81% improvement in patients’ symptoms. One randomized, double-blind, trial looked at the use of botulinum toxin A injections for the treatment of PH; it reported 90% of patients experienced an improvement in PH. The remaining two studies evaluated the use of endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) in PH, and both reported over 95% patient symptom improvement.

CONCLUSION: There are few good quality studies evaluating the treatment of primary PH. Based on the little available evidence, the interventions reviewed significantly improve the symptoms of PH. Anticholinergic medications are considered effective and safe. Both iontophoresis and botulinum toxin provided patients with symptom relief when administered regularly. ETS was reported as successful in the reduction of PH, however, it carries significant adverse effects such as compensatory sweating and the potential of complications associated with surgery.

PMID:34653261 | DOI:10.1111/ijd.15937

Progress and lack of progress in hyperhidrosis research 2015-2020. A concise systematic review

Int J Dermatol. 2021 May 26. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15654. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Hyperhidrosis is excessive sweating that is uncontrollable and occurring regardless of temperature. Quality of life is significantly impaired, and psychiatric comorbidity is common. The objective of the study is to undertake a systematic review of research in the last 5 years regarding hyperhidrosis. Five databases were searched from July 2015 to July 2020 for all research on hyperhidrosis. High-quality research articles were sought for progress in diagnosis, etiology and epidemiology, and use of patient reported outcomes (PROs) as well as randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on any treatment intervention. Outcomes of interest were disease severity, sweat rate, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Trial quality was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A narrative synthesis was presented. Twenty-nine papers were included in the review: 13 investigational articles, 10 RCTs, three cohort studies, and three reviews. The studies varied in terms of quality, population, intervention, and methods of outcome assessment. The majority were very small studies, and most RCTs were at high risk of bias. Few studies on diagnosis, epidemiology, and etiology were of sufficient quality to be presented. The interventions discussed were iontophoresis, botulinum toxin, anticholinergic medication, curettage, and energy-based technologies. Progress in the diagnostics and etiology of hyperhidrosis is limited with the same being true for treatment. In a 5-year-old systematic review, it was concluded that there was moderate-quality evidence to support the use of botulinum toxin for axillary hyperhidrosis. It was advocated to conduct a trial comparing BTX and iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis. Unfortunately, this has not yet been performed. Hyperhidrosis is still as underserved and under-studied as before.

PMID:34080686 | DOI:10.1111/ijd.15654