Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2026 Nov 4;81:101219. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101219. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare, in a Brazilian population, the clinical efficacy, Quality-of-Life (QoL) impact, and severity of compensatory sweating (CS; new excessive sweating in previously unaffected body regions) after one-stage Bilateral Thoracic Sympathectomy (BTS) versus Unilateral Sympathectomy on the dominant side (UniS), with additional assessment of patients who later underwent contralateral surgery (two-stage bilateral Sympathectomy, 2stS).
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial conducted across 11 Brazilian centers and included 163 adults with primary palmar hyperhidrosis. Participants were randomized 1:1 to BTS or UniS. From 6-months onward, UniS patients could elect contralateral sympathectomy. Sweating severity was assessed using the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) across predefined anatomical sites, and QoL was measured with the HidroQOL and Horn questionnaires. CS was defined as new postoperative sweating in previously unaffected areas (preoperative HDSS = 1) and graded by the magnitude of HDSS increase.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between groups. Improvement in the operated dominant hand was similar after BTS and UniS, whereas control of the non-operated hand favored BTS. In the UniS group, spontaneous contralateral improvement occurred in approximately 1 in 7 untreated hands. The proportion of patients without CS was similar in both groups (approximately 25%), but severe CS was more frequent after BTS than after UniS (40.4%vs. 21.0%; nominal, unadjusted p = 0.0344), an absolute difference of 19.4 percentage points. QoL improved in both groups, with larger and more sustained reductions in Horn and HidroQOL scores after BTS (p < 0.001). Thirty-two UniS patients underwent contralateral completion (40.0% of the randomized UniS group); post-completion outcome data were available for 18- at 8-months and 16- at 12-months. In this selected cohort, contralateral surgery produced additional HDSS and QoL improvement. CS was reassessed in 16 patients and occurred in 9 (56.2%; exact 95% CI 29.9%‒80.2%), with eight of nine cases classified as mild.
CONCLUSION: BTS provides more complete bilateral symptom control and greater QoL improvement, but at the cost of more severe CS. UniS offers excellent control on the treated side, reduces the risk of severe CS, and supports a staged strategy in which many patients avoid a second procedure; when needed, contralateral completion can restore additional clinical and QoL gains.
PMID:42981801 | DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101219
