Cost-effectiveness of topical glycopyrronium tosylate for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis.

Icon for Taylor & Francis Related Articles

Cost-effectiveness of topical glycopyrronium tosylate for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis.

J Med Econ. 2020 Dec 01;:1

Authors: Bloudek LM, Gillard KK, Nguyen VB, Klein SZ

Abstract
AIMS: Primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAHH) is a condition characterized by excessive sweating that negatively impacts health-related quality of life, with significant psychological and social impacts. Glycopyrronium tosylate (GT) is a topical anticholinergic approved in the United States for treatment of PAHH in patients 9 years of age and older. Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of GT as first-line topical therapy compared to topical aluminum chloride from a United States commercial perspective.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed consisting of four health states based on the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) over a time horizon of five years with discount rates of 3% for both costs and outcomes. Transitions between health states were driven by HDSS response, defined as an improvement of ≥2 points. Non-responders and those who discontinue could switch to later line treatments or no treatment. Health utility scores were based on HDSS scores, supported by published literature.
RESULTS: Over five years, GT yielded 0.12 greater QALYs and 0.93 greater LYs with response compared to treatment with prescription aluminum chloride at an incremental cost of $10,584. Relative to prescription aluminum chloride, GT resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $87,238 per QALY gained, $11,349 per LY with response. The ICER fell below $100,000 for 66% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations and below $150,000 for 82% of simulations.
LIMITATIONS: This analysis represents a simplified scenario of a hypothetical PAHH patient. Due to sparse data, assumptions were required for treatment patterns, efficacy, and persistence.
CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis of incremental cost per QALY gained, GT is may be cost-effective relative to prescription aluminum chloride at commonly accepted willingness to pay thresholds.

PMID: 33256494 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Efficacy and Tolerability of 20% Aluminum Sesquichlorohydrate vs 20% Aluminum Chloride for the Treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Icon for Wiley

Efficacy and Tolerability of 20% Aluminum Sesquichlorohydrate vs 20% Aluminum Chloride for the Treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Dermatol Ther. 2020 Sep 29;:e14354

Authors: Thianboonsong T, Kanokrungsee S, Paichitrojjana A, Udompataikul M, Kamanamool N, Rojhirunsakool S

Abstract
This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of topical aluminum sesquichlorohydrate (AS) when compared to aluminum chloride (AC) as a treatment for primary axillary hyperhidrosis. Twenty subjects were included in this randomized, controlled, split-side 8-week study. All participants applied 20% AS and 20% AC lotions in their axillae (one treatment per axilla) every night for 2 weeks; next, the application was reduced to three times a week for 4 weeks. The assessment was performed using the sweating intensity visual scale (SIVS), hyperhidrosis disease severity score (HDSS), patient satisfaction score, and the appearance of adverse effects on weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8. Both AS as well as AC application showed positive results, significantly differing from the baseline, as assessed using SIVS, HDSS, and patient satisfaction score at every follow-up visit; however, no significant difference was observed between the AS and AC groups at any follow-up visit. The mean time of response was 1.14 weeks for both treatments. A side effect was observed in one subject (5%), who reported itching on the AC axilla. The therapeutic effects persisted even after reducing the frequency of application and lasted for at least two weeks after cessation of use. In conclusion, topical 20% AS demonstrated similar efficacy to topical 20% AC in the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis, with a high safety profile. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

PMID: 32990370 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Treatment Patterns, Depression, and Anxiety Among US Patients Diagnosed with Hyperhidrosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Treatment Patterns, Depression, and Anxiety Among US Patients Diagnosed with Hyperhidrosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Sep 11;:

Authors: Klein SZ, Hull M, Gillard KK, Peterson-Brandt J

Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hyperhidrosis is associated with social and emotional stress due to limitations on health-related quality of life. This study examined real-world treatment patterns and concomitant depression and/or anxiety in patients with hyperhidrosis.
METHODS: Commercial health plan members in the US with ≥ 2 hyperhidrosis diagnosis codes and/or antiperspirant prescription claims were identified from January 2010 through November 2017. A control cohort (CC) of patients without hyperhidrosis was matched to the hyperhidrosis cohort on demographic characteristics. Depression and/or anxiety were identified by ≥ 1 relevant diagnosis code or pharmacy claim. A multivariable logistic regression model estimated odds of treatment in the hyperhidrosis cohort, and depression/anxiety in the hyperhidrosis cohort and CC, adjusting for patient characteristics.
RESULTS: A total of 44,484 patients with hyperhidrosis were identified, of whom 58.5% were female, with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 36.5 ± 16.5 years (83.5% ≥ 18 years). A small majority of patients (51.6%, 0.69/person-year) received treatment with prescription antiperspirants. Post-index oral systemic therapies, medical procedures, and surgical options were uncommon. At 12 months post-index, 48.4% of the sample had not filled a prescription for extra- or prescription-strength antiperspirants. Compared with the CC (n = 137,451), a higher percentage of patients with hyperhidrosis had depression or anxiety reported during follow-up (41.1 vs. 28.2%, p < 0.001); this corresponded to higher adjusted odds of depression/anxiety in patients with hyperhidrosis [odds ratio (OR) 1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-1.80, p < 0.001]. Baseline depression and/or anxiety were associated with lower odds of receiving hyperhidrosis treatment (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.80), as was increasing age and male gender. Patients with hyperhidrosis also had more frequent incident depression/anxiety during follow-up (18.2 vs. 10.6%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In this real-world analysis, hyperhidrosis was associated with increased odds of depression and/or anxiety. However, relatively low percentages of patients received prescription topical or oral treatments or underwent surgery, suggesting that tolerability, efficacy, and provider awareness may be limiting factors in the effective treatment of hyperhidrosis.

PMID: 32915394 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Stepwise treatment of primary focal hyperhidrosis with aluminium chloride hexahydrate lotion (20%) and oral glycopyrrolate: a retrospective study from a tertiary care centre

Abstract

Background
Primary focal hyperhidrosis is a common reason for dermatology outpatient visit and has significant impact on patient’s social and professional activities. The study describes the clinical profile of those patients and response with aluminum chloride hexahydrate lotion (ACH 20%) and oral glycopyrrolate (OGP).

Methods
A retrospective study was carried out at a tertiary care centre between the year 2016‐18. Details of history, baseline assessment, treatment response recorded in specially designed proformas were analysed. Initially the patients received topical ACH daily at night. Non‐responders were advised OGP 1 mg BD and increased to 2 mg BD if they didn’t respond. Response was measured according to patient global assessment and objective evaluation of sweating.

Results
Among total 69 patients 57 had onset

Fractional CO2 laser-assisted Botulinum toxin type A delivery for the treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis.

Related Articles

Fractional CO2 laser-assisted Botulinum toxin type A delivery for the treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis.

Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Jun 17;:

Authors: Junsuwan N, Manuskiatti W, Phothong W, Wanitphakdeedecha R

Abstract
Intradermal injections of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) have been used successfully to treat patients with primary palmoplantar hyperhidrosis (PPH). However, problems with local injections of BTX-A for palmar hyperhidrosis include injection pain and reduced palmar muscle strength. This case series describes three patients with PPH. Patients were followed up for 3 months and assessed using the minor iodine starch test and the visual analog scale (VAS). Over two sessions within a 2-week interval, all patients received treatment on one palm, while the other palm served as the untreated control. Treated palms received fractional CO2 laser therapy and immediate post-operative topical application of BTX-A solution for a total of 50 units. Sweat production was assessed based on the size of the sweat-producing area (measured by the minor iodine starch test) and subjective assessment of sweat production using the visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline, 2 weeks after the first treatment, and 1, 2, and 3 months after the second treatment. In the BTX-A-treated palm, the decrease in the mean sweat production was 51.6% at 2 weeks after the first treatment, and 88.5%, 67.8%, and 52.9%, at 1, 2, and 3 months after the final treatment when compared to the baseline. In the untreated palms, the decrease in the mean sweat production was 2% on all follow-ups when compared to the baseline. No adverse effect was observed in any patient. Fractional CO2 laser is a safe technique for BTX-A delivery on the palm area and is demonstrated to be safe and effective in decreasing sweat secretion of hyperhidrosis palm.

PMID: 32557001 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Something to Sweat About: Two Cases of Dupilumab-Induced Hyperhidrosis and Bromhidrosis.

Related Articles

Something to Sweat About: Two Cases of Dupilumab-Induced Hyperhidrosis and Bromhidrosis.

Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2152656720927703

Authors: Rowane M, Valencia R, Schend J, Jhaveri D, Hostoffer R

Abstract
Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD, eczema) is familial chronic inflammatory skin disease of complex etiology and increasing prevalence. Dupilumab is an IL-4 receptor subunit alpha (IL-4Rα) antagonist that is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved biological therapy for moderate-to-severe adult AD inadequately controlled with topical therapies. Adverse effects reported in the literature include injection site reactions, conjunctivitis, headache, and nasopharyngitis.
Objective: We report the first cases of hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis as side effects from dupilumab (Dupixent®) for the treatment of AD.
Case Reports: Case 1 is a 20-year-old woman with controlled allergic rhinitis and severe AD reported axillary hyperhidrosis with bromhidrosis, comparable to sweat from high-intensity exercise, with no relief from several different over-the-counter antiperspirants. Case 2 is a 61-year-old woman with history of chronic asthma, allergic contact dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, and AD noticed markedly increased sweating with bromhidrosis that was reminiscent of her menopausal symptomology, about 3 months after initiating dupilimab.
Discussion: Traditional immunosuppressive agents and corticosteroids have limited efficacy, numerous side effects, and increased risk of infection. The safety profile and efficacy of the newly approved IL-4Rα antagonist dupilumab may be favorable to oral immunosuppressants, but its use remains limited to severe recalcitrant cases, due to financial implications and lack of long-term safety data and comparative head-to-head trials.
Conclusion: We report improved outcomes with dupilumab, in addition to unpublished cases of bromhidrosis and hyperhidrosis in 2 patients with AD. This report of additional complications may inspire further clinical research and assist clinicians in considering the option of dupilumab for uncontrolled AD, despite aggressive traditional treatment.

PMID: 32489715 [PubMed]

Botulinum toxin type A in chronic non‐dyshidrotic palmar eczema: A side‐by‐side comparative study

Abstract
New indications are being reported for intradermal botulinum toxin type A (BTX‐A) owing to its anti‐inflammatory and antipruritic actions. Its successful use for dyshidrotic hand eczema and lichen simplex has been reported in a few cases, while its utility in dry palmar eczema not associated with hyperhidrosis has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was the assessment of the additive efficacy and tolerability of BTX‐A in chronic dry palmar eczema. This prospective non‐randomized side‐by‐side comparative study included 30 cases of chronic bilateral dry palmar eczema with no associated hyperhidrosis. Combined emollients and topical mid‐potency steroid on one side were compared with an additive 100 units of intradermal BTX‐A on the other side for efficacy and tolerability using both patient‐ and physician‐oriented scores over a period of 6 months. Timing and extent of improvement and relapse were recorded on both sides, together with the frequency of development of side‐effects. Both lines were effective and well tolerated, with significantly greater reduction of symptom and sign scores and higher overall patient satisfaction on the side receiving BTX‐A, an effect which lasted for a significantly longer duration on this side (4 months) as compared with the other side (1 month). In conclusion, intradermal BTX‐A at a dose of 100 units/palm is beneficial and well tolerated in chronic dry palmar eczema. Compared with topical steroid and emollients alone, its addition yielded superior efficacy that was longer lasting and more satisfactory to the patients, while exerting a steroid‐sparing effect.

Long-term efficacy and safety of topical glycopyrronium tosylate for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: Post hoc pediatric subgroup analysis from a 44-week open-label extension study.

Icon for Wiley Related Articles

Long-term efficacy and safety of topical glycopyrronium tosylate for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: Post hoc pediatric subgroup analysis from a 44-week open-label extension study.

Pediatr Dermatol. 2020 Mar 08;:

Authors: Hebert AA, Glaser DA, Green L, Hull C, Cather J, Drew J, Gopalan R, Pariser DM

Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Glycopyrronium tosylate (GT) cloth, 2.4% is a topical anticholinergic approved in the United States for primary axillary hyperhidrosis in patients ≥9 years. This post hoc analysis evaluated long-term response (efficacy and safety) in pediatric patients (≥9 to ≤16 years) to GT in the 44-week, open-label extension (NCT02553798) of two, phase 3, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 4-week trials (NCT02530281, NCT02530294).
METHODS: In the double-blind trials, patients ≥9 years with primary axillary hyperhidrosis were randomized 2:1 to once-daily GT:vehicle. Those who completed the study could receive open-label GT for up to an additional 44 weeks. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and local skin reactions (LSRs). Descriptive efficacy assessments included gravimetrically measured sweat production, Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale response (≥2-grade improvement), and Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index.
RESULTS: Of 43 pediatric patients completing either double-blind trial, 38 (88.4%) entered the open-label extension (age, years: 9 [n = 1], 12 [n = 2], 13 [n = 7], 14 and 15 [n = 9 each], 16 [n = 10]). The safety profile observed was similar to the double-blind trials. Most TEAEs (>95%) were mild/moderate, related to anticholinergic activity, and infrequently led to discontinuation (n = 1/38 [2.6%]). No pediatric patients experienced a serious TEAE. Most anticholinergic TEAEs did not require a dose modification and resolved within 7 days. Approximately, one-third of patients (n = 13/38 [34.2%]) had LSRs; most were mild/moderate in severity. Improvements in efficacy measures were maintained from the double-blind trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, once-daily GT for up to 48 weeks (4-week double-blind plus 44 week open label) provides a noninvasive, well-tolerated treatment option for pediatric patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis.

PMID: 32147881 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Sofpironium Bromide Gel for the Treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A Phase II, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial.

Related Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Sofpironium Bromide Gel for the Treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A Phase II, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Feb 14;:

Authors: Kirsch B, Smith S, Cohen J, DuBois J, Green L, Baumann L, Bhatia N, Pariser D, Liu PY, Chadha D, Walker P

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary axillary hyperhidrosis has limited noninvasive, effective, and well-tolerated treatment options.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the topical treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis with the novel anticholinergic sofpironium bromide.
METHODS: A phase II, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Participants were randomized to one of three doses or vehicle, with daily treatment for 42 days. Coprimary endpoints were the percentage of participants exhibiting ≥1-point improvement in Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Measure-Axillary (HDSM-Ax; logistic regression), and change in HDSM-Ax as a continuous measure (ANCOVA). Pair-wise comparisons were one-sided with alpha=0.10.
RESULTS: At end-of-therapy, 70%, 79%, 76% and 54% of participants in the 5%, 10%, 15% and vehicle groups exhibited ≥1-point improvement in HDSM-Ax (P<0.05). Least-square mean (SE) changes in HDSM-Ax were -2.02 (0.14), -2.09 (0.14), 2.10 (0.14), and -1.30 (0.14) (all P≤0.0001). Most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate.
LIMITATIONS: Not powered to detect changes in gravimetric sweat production.
CONCLUSION: Sofpironium bromide gel produced meaningful reductions in hyperhidrosis severity and had an acceptable safety profile.

PMID: 32068049 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]