Fractional CO2 laser-assisted Botulinum toxin type A delivery for the treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis.

Related Articles

Fractional CO2 laser-assisted Botulinum toxin type A delivery for the treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis.

Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Jun 17;:

Authors: Junsuwan N, Manuskiatti W, Phothong W, Wanitphakdeedecha R

Abstract
Intradermal injections of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) have been used successfully to treat patients with primary palmoplantar hyperhidrosis (PPH). However, problems with local injections of BTX-A for palmar hyperhidrosis include injection pain and reduced palmar muscle strength. This case series describes three patients with PPH. Patients were followed up for 3 months and assessed using the minor iodine starch test and the visual analog scale (VAS). Over two sessions within a 2-week interval, all patients received treatment on one palm, while the other palm served as the untreated control. Treated palms received fractional CO2 laser therapy and immediate post-operative topical application of BTX-A solution for a total of 50 units. Sweat production was assessed based on the size of the sweat-producing area (measured by the minor iodine starch test) and subjective assessment of sweat production using the visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline, 2 weeks after the first treatment, and 1, 2, and 3 months after the second treatment. In the BTX-A-treated palm, the decrease in the mean sweat production was 51.6% at 2 weeks after the first treatment, and 88.5%, 67.8%, and 52.9%, at 1, 2, and 3 months after the final treatment when compared to the baseline. In the untreated palms, the decrease in the mean sweat production was 2% on all follow-ups when compared to the baseline. No adverse effect was observed in any patient. Fractional CO2 laser is a safe technique for BTX-A delivery on the palm area and is demonstrated to be safe and effective in decreasing sweat secretion of hyperhidrosis palm.

PMID: 32557001 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Something to Sweat About: Two Cases of Dupilumab-Induced Hyperhidrosis and Bromhidrosis.

Related Articles

Something to Sweat About: Two Cases of Dupilumab-Induced Hyperhidrosis and Bromhidrosis.

Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2152656720927703

Authors: Rowane M, Valencia R, Schend J, Jhaveri D, Hostoffer R

Abstract
Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD, eczema) is familial chronic inflammatory skin disease of complex etiology and increasing prevalence. Dupilumab is an IL-4 receptor subunit alpha (IL-4Rα) antagonist that is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved biological therapy for moderate-to-severe adult AD inadequately controlled with topical therapies. Adverse effects reported in the literature include injection site reactions, conjunctivitis, headache, and nasopharyngitis.
Objective: We report the first cases of hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis as side effects from dupilumab (Dupixent®) for the treatment of AD.
Case Reports: Case 1 is a 20-year-old woman with controlled allergic rhinitis and severe AD reported axillary hyperhidrosis with bromhidrosis, comparable to sweat from high-intensity exercise, with no relief from several different over-the-counter antiperspirants. Case 2 is a 61-year-old woman with history of chronic asthma, allergic contact dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, and AD noticed markedly increased sweating with bromhidrosis that was reminiscent of her menopausal symptomology, about 3 months after initiating dupilimab.
Discussion: Traditional immunosuppressive agents and corticosteroids have limited efficacy, numerous side effects, and increased risk of infection. The safety profile and efficacy of the newly approved IL-4Rα antagonist dupilumab may be favorable to oral immunosuppressants, but its use remains limited to severe recalcitrant cases, due to financial implications and lack of long-term safety data and comparative head-to-head trials.
Conclusion: We report improved outcomes with dupilumab, in addition to unpublished cases of bromhidrosis and hyperhidrosis in 2 patients with AD. This report of additional complications may inspire further clinical research and assist clinicians in considering the option of dupilumab for uncontrolled AD, despite aggressive traditional treatment.

PMID: 32489715 [PubMed]

Botulinum toxin type A in chronic non‐dyshidrotic palmar eczema: A side‐by‐side comparative study

Abstract
New indications are being reported for intradermal botulinum toxin type A (BTX‐A) owing to its anti‐inflammatory and antipruritic actions. Its successful use for dyshidrotic hand eczema and lichen simplex has been reported in a few cases, while its utility in dry palmar eczema not associated with hyperhidrosis has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was the assessment of the additive efficacy and tolerability of BTX‐A in chronic dry palmar eczema. This prospective non‐randomized side‐by‐side comparative study included 30 cases of chronic bilateral dry palmar eczema with no associated hyperhidrosis. Combined emollients and topical mid‐potency steroid on one side were compared with an additive 100 units of intradermal BTX‐A on the other side for efficacy and tolerability using both patient‐ and physician‐oriented scores over a period of 6 months. Timing and extent of improvement and relapse were recorded on both sides, together with the frequency of development of side‐effects. Both lines were effective and well tolerated, with significantly greater reduction of symptom and sign scores and higher overall patient satisfaction on the side receiving BTX‐A, an effect which lasted for a significantly longer duration on this side (4 months) as compared with the other side (1 month). In conclusion, intradermal BTX‐A at a dose of 100 units/palm is beneficial and well tolerated in chronic dry palmar eczema. Compared with topical steroid and emollients alone, its addition yielded superior efficacy that was longer lasting and more satisfactory to the patients, while exerting a steroid‐sparing effect.

Long-term efficacy and safety of topical glycopyrronium tosylate for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: Post hoc pediatric subgroup analysis from a 44-week open-label extension study.

Icon for Wiley Related Articles

Long-term efficacy and safety of topical glycopyrronium tosylate for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: Post hoc pediatric subgroup analysis from a 44-week open-label extension study.

Pediatr Dermatol. 2020 Mar 08;:

Authors: Hebert AA, Glaser DA, Green L, Hull C, Cather J, Drew J, Gopalan R, Pariser DM

Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Glycopyrronium tosylate (GT) cloth, 2.4% is a topical anticholinergic approved in the United States for primary axillary hyperhidrosis in patients ≥9 years. This post hoc analysis evaluated long-term response (efficacy and safety) in pediatric patients (≥9 to ≤16 years) to GT in the 44-week, open-label extension (NCT02553798) of two, phase 3, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 4-week trials (NCT02530281, NCT02530294).
METHODS: In the double-blind trials, patients ≥9 years with primary axillary hyperhidrosis were randomized 2:1 to once-daily GT:vehicle. Those who completed the study could receive open-label GT for up to an additional 44 weeks. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and local skin reactions (LSRs). Descriptive efficacy assessments included gravimetrically measured sweat production, Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale response (≥2-grade improvement), and Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index.
RESULTS: Of 43 pediatric patients completing either double-blind trial, 38 (88.4%) entered the open-label extension (age, years: 9 [n = 1], 12 [n = 2], 13 [n = 7], 14 and 15 [n = 9 each], 16 [n = 10]). The safety profile observed was similar to the double-blind trials. Most TEAEs (>95%) were mild/moderate, related to anticholinergic activity, and infrequently led to discontinuation (n = 1/38 [2.6%]). No pediatric patients experienced a serious TEAE. Most anticholinergic TEAEs did not require a dose modification and resolved within 7 days. Approximately, one-third of patients (n = 13/38 [34.2%]) had LSRs; most were mild/moderate in severity. Improvements in efficacy measures were maintained from the double-blind trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, once-daily GT for up to 48 weeks (4-week double-blind plus 44 week open label) provides a noninvasive, well-tolerated treatment option for pediatric patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis.

PMID: 32147881 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Sofpironium Bromide Gel for the Treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A Phase II, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial.

Related Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Sofpironium Bromide Gel for the Treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A Phase II, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Feb 14;:

Authors: Kirsch B, Smith S, Cohen J, DuBois J, Green L, Baumann L, Bhatia N, Pariser D, Liu PY, Chadha D, Walker P

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary axillary hyperhidrosis has limited noninvasive, effective, and well-tolerated treatment options.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the topical treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis with the novel anticholinergic sofpironium bromide.
METHODS: A phase II, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Participants were randomized to one of three doses or vehicle, with daily treatment for 42 days. Coprimary endpoints were the percentage of participants exhibiting ≥1-point improvement in Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Measure-Axillary (HDSM-Ax; logistic regression), and change in HDSM-Ax as a continuous measure (ANCOVA). Pair-wise comparisons were one-sided with alpha=0.10.
RESULTS: At end-of-therapy, 70%, 79%, 76% and 54% of participants in the 5%, 10%, 15% and vehicle groups exhibited ≥1-point improvement in HDSM-Ax (P<0.05). Least-square mean (SE) changes in HDSM-Ax were -2.02 (0.14), -2.09 (0.14), 2.10 (0.14), and -1.30 (0.14) (all P≤0.0001). Most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate.
LIMITATIONS: Not powered to detect changes in gravimetric sweat production.
CONCLUSION: Sofpironium bromide gel produced meaningful reductions in hyperhidrosis severity and had an acceptable safety profile.

PMID: 32068049 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Pressure-and dose-controlled, needle-free, transcutaneous pneumatic injection of botulinum neurotoxin-A for the treatment of primary axillary and palmoplantar hyperhidrosis.

Related Articles

Pressure-and dose-controlled, needle-free, transcutaneous pneumatic injection of botulinum neurotoxin-A for the treatment of primary axillary and palmoplantar hyperhidrosis.

Skin Res Technol. 2020 Jan 10;:

Authors: Kim HM, Lee MJ, Lee MH, Lee H

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) effectively downregulates the secretion of eccrine sweat glands in patients with axillary and palmoplantar primary hyperhidrosis (PH).
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of pressure- and dose-controlled, needle-free, transcutaneous pneumatic injection (TPI) of BoNT-A for treating axillary and palmoplantar PH.
METHODS: Needleless TPI-BoNT-A treatments were delivered on the axillary or palmoplantar skin at a pneumatic pressure of 2.05 bars and an injection volume of 0.08 mL/shot. The efficacy thereof was assessed by evaluating starch-iodine test results and Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) scores.
RESULTS: At baseline, median HDSS scores were 3 (IQR, 3-4) for axillary lesions and 4 (IQR, 3.5-4) for palmoplantar lesions. Median HDSS scores at 1 month after TPI-BoNT-A treatment significantly decreased to 1 (IQR, 1-1.75) for axillary lesions (P < .001) and 1 (IQR, 1-2) for palmoplantar lesions (P < .001). Median global improvement scale scores were 4 (IQR, 3.25-4) for axillary PH and 3 (IQR, 2.5-4) for palmoplantar PH (P > .05). In all patients, pain was tolerable during treatments for both axillary and palmoplantar PH after the application of topical anesthetic cream.
CONCLUSION: Pressure- and dose-controlled, needle-free, BoNT delivery effectively and safely decreased sweating in axillary and palmoplantar skin.

PMID: 31922304 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Botulinum Toxin: Pharmacology and Injectable Administration for the Treatment of Primary Hyperhidrosis.

Icon for Elsevier Science Related Articles

Botulinum Toxin: Pharmacology and Injectable Administration for the Treatment of Primary Hyperhidrosis.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Dec 04;:

Authors: Nawrocki S, Cha J

Abstract
Hyperhidrosis is a dermatological condition defined by excessive sweating beyond thermoregulatory needs with significant effects on patients’ quality of life. Hyperhidrosis is categorized as primary or secondary: primary hyperhidrosis is mostly focal and idiopathic, whereas secondary hyperhidrosis is commonly generalized and caused by an underlying medical condition or use of medications. Various surgical and nonsurgical therapies exist for primary hyperhidrosis. Although botulinum toxin is one of the deadliest toxins known, when used in small doses, it is one of the most effective therapies for primary hyperhidrosis. Botulinum toxin injections are widely used as a second-line primary hyperhidrosis treatment option, when topical treatment strategies have failed. This article provides an overview of the commercially available botulinum toxin formulations and their applications for the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis.

PMID: 31811879 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]