The treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis – a systematic review

Int J Dermatol. 2021 Oct 15. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15937. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PH) can have a significantly negative impact on an individual’s quality of life. Currently, there appears to be no review of the effectiveness of the different interventions for its management.

METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidelines, the Cochrane Database, and MEDLINE (OVID) to identify relevant studies published from 1997 to 2017.

RESULTS: Of the 574 references yielded, six met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for this review. Two studies evaluated the use of oral oxybutynin as an anticholinergic treatment for PH; this demonstrated high efficacy with over 80% of patients reporting symptom improvement; dry mouth was the most common adverse effect reported. One study looking at the use of iontophoresis reported 81% improvement in patients’ symptoms. One randomized, double-blind, trial looked at the use of botulinum toxin A injections for the treatment of PH; it reported 90% of patients experienced an improvement in PH. The remaining two studies evaluated the use of endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) in PH, and both reported over 95% patient symptom improvement.

CONCLUSION: There are few good quality studies evaluating the treatment of primary PH. Based on the little available evidence, the interventions reviewed significantly improve the symptoms of PH. Anticholinergic medications are considered effective and safe. Both iontophoresis and botulinum toxin provided patients with symptom relief when administered regularly. ETS was reported as successful in the reduction of PH, however, it carries significant adverse effects such as compensatory sweating and the potential of complications associated with surgery.

PMID:34653261 | DOI:10.1111/ijd.15937

Progress and lack of progress in hyperhidrosis research 2015-2020. A concise systematic review

Int J Dermatol. 2021 May 26. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15654. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Hyperhidrosis is excessive sweating that is uncontrollable and occurring regardless of temperature. Quality of life is significantly impaired, and psychiatric comorbidity is common. The objective of the study is to undertake a systematic review of research in the last 5 years regarding hyperhidrosis. Five databases were searched from July 2015 to July 2020 for all research on hyperhidrosis. High-quality research articles were sought for progress in diagnosis, etiology and epidemiology, and use of patient reported outcomes (PROs) as well as randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on any treatment intervention. Outcomes of interest were disease severity, sweat rate, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Trial quality was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A narrative synthesis was presented. Twenty-nine papers were included in the review: 13 investigational articles, 10 RCTs, three cohort studies, and three reviews. The studies varied in terms of quality, population, intervention, and methods of outcome assessment. The majority were very small studies, and most RCTs were at high risk of bias. Few studies on diagnosis, epidemiology, and etiology were of sufficient quality to be presented. The interventions discussed were iontophoresis, botulinum toxin, anticholinergic medication, curettage, and energy-based technologies. Progress in the diagnostics and etiology of hyperhidrosis is limited with the same being true for treatment. In a 5-year-old systematic review, it was concluded that there was moderate-quality evidence to support the use of botulinum toxin for axillary hyperhidrosis. It was advocated to conduct a trial comparing BTX and iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis. Unfortunately, this has not yet been performed. Hyperhidrosis is still as underserved and under-studied as before.

PMID:34080686 | DOI:10.1111/ijd.15654

Management of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis: An Algorithmic Approach

J Drugs Dermatol. 2021 May 1;20(5):523-528. doi: 10.36849/JDD.5774.

ABSTRACT

Hyperhidrosis (HH) is defined as perspiration beyond the level required to maintain temperature regulation. HH affects nearly 4.8% of the population in the United States. It can have a great impact on patient’s quality of life by disturbing daily activity, performance, confidence, social interactions, and mental health. In the majority of patients with HH (93%), the etiology of excess sweating is idiopathic, which classifies it as primary focal HH. Mild HH may be controlled with topical antiperspirants and lifestyle modifications. Based on the location of involvement, iontophoresis and botulinum toxin may be considered if the patient does not respond to topical therapies. Despite minimizing sweating, chronic use of systemic anticholinergics, in particular oxybutynin, may result in detrimental adverse effects such as dementia. Local surgery, radiofrequency, microwave, and lasers are other potential modalities for HH. Sympathectomy can be a last resort for the treatment of focal HH of the palmar, plantar, axillary, and craniofacial areas after failure of less invasive therapeutic options. In this review, we conducted a comprehensive search in the PubMed electronic database to summarize an algorithmic approach for the treatment of HH. This can help broaden options for managing this difficult disease. J Drugs Dermatol. 20(5): doi:10.36849/JDD.5774.

PMID:33938689 | DOI:10.36849/JDD.5774

Intra tester reliability of sympathetic skin responses in subjects with primary palmar hyperhidrosis.

Icon for Elsevier Science Related Articles

Intra tester reliability of sympathetic skin responses in subjects with primary palmar hyperhidrosis.

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Oct;24(4):57-62

Authors: Ghandali E, Hosseini SM, Moghimi HR, Khademi-Kalantari K, Talebian Moghadam S, Baghban AA, Mortazavi SM

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PPH) is a disorder related to sympathetic dysfunction. Iontophoresis can be used to reduce sweating rate. Sympathetic skin response (SSR) is commonly used to evaluate the sympathetic system. However, scarce evidence exists about the reliability of SSR parameters.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative and absolute reliability of SSR before and after the application of iontophoresis with aluminum chloride hexahydrate (ACH) gel or tap water in subjects with PPH.
METHODS: Twenty subjects were randomized to receive either iontophoresis with ACH gel or tap water. Three SSRs (amplitude and latency) with 5 s intervals from both hands in both groups were recorded before and after the application of iontophoresis for 30 min. Reliability of amplitude and latency of the SSR was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals, standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC).
RESULTS: Amplitudes and latencies of SSR showed good to excellent test-retest reliability for ICC in both groups before iontophoresis. Except for right hand latency which was moderate (0.5-0.75). After iontophoresis, the ACH gel group still showed good to excellent agreement for SSR parameters, while the reliability of SSR parameters in the tap water group was reduced.
CONCLUSION: Subjects with PPH showed high intra-rater reliability for SSR parameters which was maintained after ACH gel iontophoresis and decreased after tap water iontophoresis. It seems that media used for iontophoresis or the state of media (gel vs liquid) may affect the reliability of SSR. Further research is recommended.

PMID: 33218563 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Previous recreational cold exposure does not alter endothelial function or sensory thermal thresholds in the hands or feet

New Findings

What is the central question of this study?

Does recreational cold exposure result in cold sensitivity and is this associated with endothelial dysfunction and impaired sensory thermal thresholds?

What is the main finding and its importance?

Previous cold exposure was correlated with foot cold sensitivity which may indicate the development of a subclinical non‐freezing cold injury. Endothelial function and thermal detection were not impaired in cold sensitive individuals therefore further research is required to understand the pathophysiology of subclinical and clinical forms of non‐freezing cold injury.

Abstract
This study investigated whether cold sensitive (CS) individuals, who rewarm more slowly following a mild cold challenge, have impaired endothelial function and sensory thermal thresholds (STT) and whether this was related to reported cold exposure. Twenty seven participants with varying previous cold exposure undertook three tests: STT: warm and cold STT of the fingers and dorsal foot. Endothelial function: measurement of cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) during iontophoresis of acetylcholine on the forearm, finger and foot. CS test: involving immersion of a foot for 2 minutes in 15°C water followed by 10 minutes of rewarming in 30°C air. Toe skin temperature (Tsk) measured during the CS test was used to form a CS group ( 32°C; n = 9 [4 women] for both groups). A moderate relationship was found between cold exposure ranking and Tsk rewarming (r = 0.408, P = 0.035, n = 27) but not STT or endothelial function. Tsk and blood flow were lower in CS compared to CONTROL before and after foot immersion (Tsk, mean [sd]: 30.3 [0.9]°C v 34.8 [0.8]°C; 27.9 [0.8]°C v 34.3 [0.8]°C; P 

Effects of Direct Current Administration on Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale in Patients with Axillary Hyperhidrosis.

Related Articles

Effects of Direct Current Administration on Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale in Patients with Axillary Hyperhidrosis.

Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:3232015

Authors: Şener S, Karakoç Y

Abstract
Background: Focal hyperhidrosis mostly affects the axillae, hands, feet, and face. For the management, several techniques are used. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of direct current administration on the hyperhidrosis disease severity scale (HDSS) in patients with axillary hyperhidrosis that have various HDSS scores.
Design and Setting: Original article, University Hospital.
Methods: Sixty patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis were inquired about the HDSS scores and the scores were noted at the onset and at the end of the 10th application. One month after the last session, HDSS scores were also inquired. At the end of 1-month follow-up, the patients whose HDSS scores rose after the 10th session were accepted as nonresponder. For the current delivery, a new iontophoresis application module (Sweat CureR) designed by Dr. Karakoc was used.
Results: Direct current application decreased axillary sweat intensity by 70% at both sides, and lowered the HDSS by about 1.5 degree. Major reduction in sweat intensity was in the patients with low HDSS scores (75%). Negative correlation was found between initial HDSS scores and median values of decreased sweat intensity (r = -0.317, p = 0.022). Minimal temporary side effects including skin irritation and one or more vesicle formation were inspected in 29 patients and, the permanent punctual pigmentation was observed only in one patient.
Conclusions: Decrease in axillary hyperhidrosis is satisfactory for these patients. Since iontophoresis application has beneficial effect and minimal side effects, it should be recommended to the patients before advanced management or surgical techniques.

PMID: 31781610 [PubMed – in process]

Management Strategies Of Palmar Hyperhidrosis: Challenges And Solutions.

Related Articles

Management Strategies Of Palmar Hyperhidrosis: Challenges And Solutions.

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019;12:733-744

Authors: Gregoriou S, Sidiropoulou P, Kontochristopoulos G, Rigopoulos D

Abstract
Palmar hyperhidrosis is a potentially disabling condition for which management remains a therapeutic challenge. Given the significant impact on quality of life, various treatment options are available, ranging from topical agents and medical devices to systemic therapies and surgical interventions. Nonsurgical approaches, i.e. topical antiperspirants, botulinum toxin injections, iontophoresis, and systemic agents, are all supported by the current literature. Patients with mild-to-moderate disease can often benefit from topical therapies only. As disease severity progresses, systemic oral medication, such as anticholinergic drugs, usually becomes necessary. Last-line surgical approaches (sympathetic denervation) should be reserved for severe refractory cases. Recently, therapeutic strategies have been evolving with several new agents emerging as promising alternatives in clinical trials. In practice, however, each modality comes with its own benefits and risks. An individual therapeutic ladder is generally recommended, taking into account disease severity, benefit-to-risk profile, treatment cost, patient preference, and clinician expertise. This review will provide an update on current and emerging concepts of management for excessive hand sweating to help clinicians optimize therapeutic decision-making.

PMID: 31632121 [PubMed]

The Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis

Related Articles

The Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis

Skin Therapy Lett. 2018 Jan;24(1):7

Authors: Wechter T, Feldman SR, Taylor SL

Abstract
Primary focal hyperhidrosis is a relatively common disease that has a significant impact on afflicted patient’s quality of life. The pathogenesis of the disease is thought to stem from increased cholinergic activity on eccrine sweat glands. Topical aluminum chloride based antiperspirants are good first-line agents for all affected body sites. Anticholinergic agents are emerging as effective topical alternatives. Iontophoresis passes an electrical current through the skin and is an excellent treatment option for palmoplantar disease. Botulinum toxin type A injections remain a mainstay second-line treatment. Local procedural advances including microwave thermolysis, laser therapy and focused ultrasound are emerging as safe and effective alternatives for refractory disease. Oral anticholinergics are generally well tolerated and can also be used for intractable disease. Last-line interventions include local surgical options and sympathectomy, though some patients may prefer permanent treatment. Further investigation of novel treatments as well as ways to optimize existing therapeutic options are needed.

PMID: 30817880 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

The Etiology, Diagnosis and Management of Hyperhidrosis: A Comprehensive Review. Part II. Therapeutic Options.

The Etiology, Diagnosis and Management of Hyperhidrosis: A Comprehensive Review. Part II. Therapeutic Options.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan 30;:

Authors: Nawrocki S, Cha J

Abstract
Hyperhidrosis (HH) is a chronic disorder of excess sweat production that may have a significant adverse effect on quality of life. A variety of treatment modalities currently exist to manage HH. Initial treatment includes lifestyle and behavioral recommendations. Antiperspirants are regarded as the first-line therapy for primary focal HH and can provide significant benefit. Iontophoresis is considered to be the primary remedy for palmar and plantar HH. Botulinum toxin (BTX) injections are administered at the dermal-subcutaneous junction and serve as a safe and effective treatment option for focal HH. Oral systemic agents are reserved for treatment-resistant cases or for generalized HH. Energy delivering devices such as lasers, ultrasound technology, microwave thermolysis, and fractional microneedle radiofrequency may also be utilized to reduce focal sweating. Surgery may be considered when more conservative treatments have failed. Local surgical techniques, particularly for axillary HH, include excision, curettage, liposuction, or a combination of these techniques. Sympathectomy is the treatment of last resort when conservative treatments are unsuccessful or intolerable, and after accepting secondary compensatory HH as a potential complication. A review of treatment modalities for HH and a sequenced approach are presented.

PMID: 30710603 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Topical Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis, Part 1.

Related Articles

Topical Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis, Part 1.

Int J Pharm Compd. 2019 Jan-Feb;23(1):23-31

Authors: Zur E

Abstract
Primary focal hyperhidrosis is idiopathic, localized, uncontrollable, excessive, and unpredictable sweating beyond what is necessary to regulate body temperature. Primary hyperhidrosis is thought to affect approximately 2% to 3% of the population, and its effect on a patient’s quality of life is very significant. Primary focal hyperhidrosis can be managed using various therapeutic options, including drugs (topical and systemic), nonsurgical interventions (e.g., iontophoresis, botulinum toxin injections), and surgery. This article, which is presented in 2 parts, is a comprehensive review of the topical, evidence-based treatments of primary focal hyperhidrosis, and it covers the following active pharmaceutical ingredients: aluminum salts, methenamine, glycopyrronium salts, oxybutynin chloride; the latter 2 ingredients will be discussed in part 2 of this article. This article discusses the evidence-based data that exists from clinical trials that support the use of topical medications to treat the pathology from efficacy and from a safety point of view. This review also discusses compounding considerations for professionally and safely compounding various topical preparations. In addition, a range of relevant formulas are attached to the article and can be used by compounding pharmacists.

PMID: 30668532 [PubMed – in process]